Headlines UK

Angela Merkel’s centre-right party elects Armin Laschet as new leader

German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s centre-right party has elected a new leader to take over ahead of the national elections in September.

Armin Laschet, the pragmatic governor of North Rhine-Westphalia, was announced the winner at a virtual conference hosted by the Christian Democratic Union party on Saturday in Berlin.  

The 59-year-old is a fervent Merkel loyalist and is seen as the continuity candidate ahead of the election which will see Germans deciding on their first new chancellor in 15 years.

Merkel, 66, the longest serving head of government in the EU, was first elected chancellor in 2005 and announced two years ago that she would be stepping down at the end of her term. 

The new elected Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party leader Armin Laschet reacts after being elected at the party's 33rd congress, held online because of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in Berlin, Germany, January 16, 2021

German Chancellor Angela Merkel at a cabinet meeting last week (left) and the newly elected Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party leader Armin Laschet today after his victory (right)

Paul Ziemiak (R), secrtaray general of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU listens to the speech of German Chancellor Angela Merkel during CDU party virtual party congress in Berlin, Germany, 15 January 2021

Paul Ziemiak (R), secrtaray general of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU listens to the speech of German Chancellor Angela Merkel during CDU party virtual party congress in Berlin, Germany, 15 January 2021

Candidates for the new CDU party chairman (R-L) Friedrich Merz, Armin Laschet and Norbert Roettgen attend a CDU virtual party congress in Berlin on Saturday

Candidates for the new CDU party chairman (R-L) Friedrich Merz, Armin Laschet and Norbert Roettgen attend a CDU virtual party congress in Berlin on Saturday

She was attending today’s conference via video call as Laschet defeated Friedrich Merz, a conservative and one-time Merkel rival, by 521 votes to 466. 

The decision ends an 11-month leadership limbo in Germany’s strongest party after outgoing leader Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, who had failed to impose her authority on the party, announced her resignation. 

Kramp-Karrenbauer took over as leader of the party two years ago while Merkel remained as chancellor.

Laschet has been handed the difficult prospect of trying to unite the party under his leadership, something which Kramp-Karrenbauer struggled with.

A soft-spoken political moderate with a reputation for pragmatism, Laschet famously stuck by Merkel in 2015 during the migrant crisis. 

If anything, he is seen as even more pro-migration than Merkel, celebrating diversity as a economic and social boon to his state.

During his campaign to head the CDU, he positioned himself as the Merkel’s natural successor, telling Stern magazine that ‘a break with Angela Merkel would send exactly the wrong signal’. 

On Saturday, he spoke to his fellow delegates on the value of moderation.  

‘We must speak clearly but not polarise,’ he said. ‘We must be able to integrate, hold society together.’

He said that ‘we will only win if we remain strong in the middle of society.’ 

Laschet said that ‘there are many people who find Angela Merkel good and only after that the CDU. He added that ‘we need this trust now as a party’ and that ‘we must work for this trust.’

Laschet emerged as an early favourite when the race to head the party was thrown open last year after the surprise resignation of Kramp-Karrenbauer.

The new elected Christian Democratic Union, CDU, party chairman Armin Laschet, centre, greets by outgoing chairwoman Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, left, after the voting at a digital party convention in Berlin

The new elected Christian Democratic Union, CDU, party chairman Armin Laschet, centre, greets by outgoing chairwoman Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, left, after the voting at a digital party convention in Berlin

Laschet, left, fist bumps his rival candidate Friedrich Merz during the final vote count today

Laschet, left, fist bumps his rival candidate Friedrich Merz during the final vote count today

Laschet shows off a lucky coin offered to him by his father as he delivers his speech on Saturday

Laschet shows off a lucky coin offered to him by his father as he delivers his speech on Saturday

Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party leader Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer gets a final touch of make-up before going out to speak to the party conference in Berlin

Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party leader Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer gets a final touch of make-up before going out to speak to the party conference in Berlin

A Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party member watches German Chancellor Angela Merkel delivering a speech on a screen

A Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party member watches German Chancellor Angela Merkel delivering a speech on a screen

But his path to the top was anything but smooth, with critics accusing him of flip-flopping and poor leadership over his handling of the pandemic in North Rhine-Westphalia.

In the spring, Laschet pushed aggressively for the loosening of restrictions to curb the spread of the virus – only to backtrack after a huge outbreak at a slaughterhouse.

He also sparked a row when he appeared to blame eastern Europeans for importing new coronavirus cases to Germany.

While he has been praised for his ability to unify, he is also seen as ‘indecisive, sometimes acting impulsively’, according to the daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung. 

But Laschet was boosted by a strong performance for the CDU in local elections in North Rhine-Westphalia in September, hailing the result as an endorsement of the party’s ‘moderate course’.

In a recent interview with the Bild daily, he highlighted his experience as a state premier as a reason for CDU delegates to vote for him.

‘It also doesn’t hurt to have won an election before. And it is important to be able to bring people together,’ he said.

CDU members may also have been swayed by Laschet’s alliance with Health Minister Jens Spahn, whose efforts to steer Germany through the pandemic have made him a favourite with the public.

The pair wrote a joint article for Der Spiegel weekly promising to make the CDU ‘one of the most modern parties in Europe’ and stressing that leadership ‘does not mean a one-man show’.

In what appeared to be an endorsement for Laschet, Merkel on the eve of the vote called for a moderate leader for the party and said she wished for a ‘team’ to be elected.

The new elected Christian Democratic Union, CDU, party chairman Armin Laschet speaks after the voting at a digital party convention in Berlin

The new elected Christian Democratic Union, CDU, party chairman Armin Laschet speaks after the voting at a digital party convention in Berlin

Outgoing Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party leader Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer attends the CDU virtual party congress in Berlin

Outgoing Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party leader Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer attends the CDU virtual party congress in Berlin

Laschet was born in Aachen, the spa city in western Germany near the border with Belgium and the Netherlands. 

He is a great fan of Charlemagne, the king of the Franks credited with uniting Europe whose empire was based in Aachen. His family has even claimed they are direct descendants.

But playing up his everyday man image, Laschet underlined in a speech before the vote that his father worked in a mine and taught him that ‘when you’re down in the mine, it doesn’t matter where your colleague comes from, what his religion is or what he looks like. What is important is, can you rely on him.’

His wife is of French-speaking Wallonian origin and he speaks fluent French. The pair have three children.

Laschet studied law and political science in Munich and Bonn before working as a journalist for Bavarian radio stations and television, and as the editor of a Catholic newspaper.

The self-described ‘passionate European’ was elected to the Bundestag in 1994 and to the European Parliament in 1999.

He became head of the CDU in the state in 2012 and has been state premier since 2017. 

California Headline USA Politics

Arnold Schwarzenegger compares assault on the Capitol to the rise of the Nazis in Germany | The State

Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Matt Winkelmeyer / Getty Images

Actor and former Republican California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger called Donald Trump the “worst president in history” and likened the assault on Capitol Hill to the rise to power of the Nazis in Germany.

“Wednesday was from Broken Glass Day here in America, the broken glass was the windows of the US Capitol. Not only did they tear down the doors of the building that houses American democracy, they trampled on the very principles on which this country was founded, ”he said. Schwarzenegger in a powerful video message.

The actor also accused Trump of seeking “A hit fooling people with his lies”.

Schwarzenegger, born in Austria, referred to what is known as the Night of Broken Glass, 1938 in which the Nazis attacked Jewish homes and businesses in Germany, which is considered the prelude to the Holocaust.

That terrible night was carried out by “the Nazi equivalents of the Proud Boys“He said in reference to the far-right group that participated on January 6 in Washington in the march to support Trump.

“The worst ever”

“President Trump is a failed leader. He will go down in history as the worst president in history. The good news is that it will soon be as irrelevant as an old tweet, “he added. the protagonist of “Terminator”.

Authorities began arresting participants in the assault on Capitol Hill this weekend as Congressional Democrats detail their plans to begin the process for a second impeachment of Trump, just less than two weeks after his term ends after losing the election to Democrat Joe Biden, who will take office on January 20.

A mob of protesters who support the president broke into the Capitol and had clashes with the police, which took hours to regain control.

Five people, one of them a policeman, died.



Coronavirus: Germany passes 40,000 dead, Merkel says worst is yet to come

The total number of deaths caused by the coronavirus in Germany crossed the 40,000 threshold on Sunday, announced the Robert Koch Institute for Public Health (RKI), and Chancellor Angela Merkel warned that the next few weeks will be “the phase la worst of the pandemic ”.

• Read also: Coronavirus: Belgium crosses the 20,000 dead mark

Germany has recorded 465 deaths from Covid-19 disease in the past 24 hours, bringing the total since the start of the pandemic to 40,343, the institute said.

More than 1.9 million people have been infected so far, with nearly 17,000 new cases recorded since Saturday.

In her weekly video message on Saturday, Chancellor Angela Merkel warned that the full impact of the intensification of social contact during the Christmas and New Year periods was not yet showing in the statistics.

She warned the Germans that the coming weeks would be “the hardest phase of the pandemic” to date with many doctors and medical staff working to their maximum capacity.

Germany, the most populous country in the European Union with some 83 million inhabitants, is struggling to contain the pandemic. It was hit hard by the second wave of the virus after being relatively spared compared to many other European countries during the first phase.

The country has just extended and strengthened partial containment until January 31 and is urging citizens to reduce their contacts even further.

More than 5,000 Covid-19 patients are currently in intensive care in Germany and more than 80% of the beds in the intensive care units are occupied.

Schools like most non-food shops, bars, restaurants, cultural, sports and leisure facilities are closed until the end of January.

Like other European countries, Germany started its vaccination campaign at the end of December, with the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine being given to more than half a million people so far. A second vaccine, that of the American laboratory Moderna, will soon be used after being authorized Wednesday in the EU.

“Absolutely necessary”

Merkel admitted that the vaccination campaign had taken a long time to start, but “the tempo will pick up,” she said. “What is important is that we can say: we will have enough vaccines available for everyone in Germany,” she added.

“Month after month, we are going to vaccinate more people and at the end of the day we will be able to offer the vaccine to anyone who wants it,” the Chancellor continued.

The vaccines allow “a justified hope” that the world will be able to overcome the pandemic, she said. But she asked her fellow citizens to remain patient, saying she “firmly believes” that the restrictions currently imposed on daily life are “absolutely necessary”.

A poll carried out by Kantar for the Sunday weekly Bild am Sonntag shows that 56% of Germans agree with the latest measures adopted to fight the virus. Among those polled, 25% believe that these measures do not go far enough and only 16% consider them too strict.

Headlines UK

Marks & Spencer’s Percy Pigs are among the first victims of Brexit red tape and tariffs 

Marks & Spencer’s Percy Pigs are among the first victims of Brexit red tape and tariffs

  • Exports of the popular Marks & Spencer’s pink sweets hit by new paperwork 
  • Sweets are manufactured in Germany and distributed from the UK to Europe
  • Under government’s new trade deal the system may trigger a tariff 

Percy Pig fans are among the first victims of Brexit red tape and tariffs.

Exports of the popular Marks & Spencer sweets to stores in Ireland, France and the Czech Republic have been hit by new paperwork and potential charges brought in when the transition period ended last year.

The problem stems from the fact that the sweets are manufactured in Germany and sent to M&S, which then distributes them around the UK but also to its outlets in Europe.

Fans of Marks and Spencer’s Percy Pigs may be disappointed as exports of the sweets have been hit by new paperwork and potential charges 

Under the Government’s trade deal with the EU, this pattern of importing products made overseas then exporting them to Europe may trigger a tariff. M&S chief executive Steve Rowe said the issue applies to around one third of the company’s food products and threatens to add significant cost and complexity to business.

The British Retail Consortium said at least 50 of its members face generating potential tariffs for re-exporting goods.

Its trade policy adviser, William Bain, said: ‘We need a solution which genuinely reflects the needs of UK-EU supply and distribution chains for goods.’ Other retailers, including John Lewis and TKMaxx, have identified similar problems – and have suspended some of their European sales as a result.

At the company’s Christmas trading update, chief executive Steve Rowe explained the sweets are a typical example of the problems facing retailers. 

He said: “Essentially, there is about a third of the product in our food business that is subject to very complex rules of origin arrangements, around the components within it, and how much has been altered in the UK.

“Depending on that there is a variable tariff.

“Any product that’s manufactured in Europe, comes to the UK and is then redistributed to somewhere like Republic of Ireland also, potentially faces a tariff.

“So, the best example is Percy Pig is actually manufactured in Germany, and if it comes to the UK and we then send it to Ireland, in theory, he would have some tax on it.

“So we’ve got a lot to do in terms of composition and rerouting, but it’s really important that we continue to be focused on trading the business.

“And, at the moment, making sure we’ve got constant continuity of supply in our Irish business.”

The British Retail Consortium (BRC) said that “at least 50” of its members face potential tariffs for re-exporting goods following the agreement of the Trade and Co-operation Agreement (TCA).

It comes as Marks & Spencer is poised to snap up upmarket fashion brand Jaeger following the historic firm’s collapse last autumn.

M&S is understood to be in the final throes of sealing a deal to buy the fashion house, which has been worn by A-list stars – including Audrey Hepburn – and royals alike during its stellar 133-year history.

Jaeger was placed into administration alongside sister firm Peacocks in November by Dubai-based owner and retail billionaire Philip Day.


Germany forced to extend anti-COVID-19 restrictions

Germany, where criticism is mounting against a vaccination campaign deemed too slow, is preparing on Tuesday to extend its restrictions against the COVID-19 pandemic, including the closure of schools.

• Read also: Return to total containment in England, announces Boris Johnson

Chancellor Angela Merkel and the 16 regional states are expected to decide on Tuesday by videoconference that these limitations be extended beyond January 10.

A majority of regions would be in favor of an extension until January 31.

Businesses, with the exception of food stores and pharmacies, schools, kindergartens and cultural venues should therefore keep their doors closed in the coming weeks. Employers are encouraged to favor telework at all costs.


Considered a European “good pupil” in the management of the first epidemic wave, Germany now has great difficulty in containing the virus, in particular in the Länder of the former GDR.

The threshold of 1,000 daily deaths was thus crossed for the first time on December 30. Some 1,775 million cases have been identified in total since the start of the pandemic, which has killed more than 34,000.

And the impact of going on vacation and family reunions is not yet known, warn health authorities.

“There is little room for flexibility,” government spokesman Steffen Seibert summed up Monday.

The “historic” crisis of the coronavirus is expected to continue in 2021, for his part warned on December 31, Merkel in her final New Year’s greetings as Chancellor.

The situation remains particularly critical in Saxony, a former GDR state-region for a long time resistant to restrictions, the incidence rate of which reached Monday 323. Other regions of East Germany, such as Thuringia or Brandenburg, region surrounding Berlin, are also hit hard.

An extension of the restrictions is thus deemed “inevitable” by the Minister-President of Saxony, the conservative Michael Kretschmer, who a few weeks ago still castigated the “hysteria” of anti-COVID-19 measures.

“Great failure”

Given as an example before the summer, Germany, where an anti-mask movement has emerged mixing vaccine refractors, followers of conspiracy theories and far-right activists, has failed since September to take effective measures against the coronavirus.

Angela Merkel, whose popularity remains very high with less than a year of her departure from the chancellery, was unable in early autumn to impose stricter measures on regions worried about the loss of ‘economic activity.

The management of the second wave thus borders on the “big failure”, according to the daily Die Welt, pointing to “hesitations, quarrels over competences and strategic errors”.

In addition to the restrictions, Germany is relying heavily on the vaccination campaign launched on Saturday to contain the epidemic.

More than 264,000 elderly people and nursing staff received a first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on Monday.

If the vaccination rate is much faster than many European neighbors, in particular France, voices are being raised in Germany to criticize its supposed slowness.

Some 44% of Germans are not convinced by the vaccine strategy, compared to 40% who think the opposite, according to a Civey poll.

Daily Bild, the most widely read in Germany, is leading a campaign against the government, accused of having “relied too much on the European Union” in its vaccination strategy and its supply, and of favoring the only Pfizer-BioNTech product to the detriment of the Moderna vaccine.

“We cannot make our impatience the measure of all things and snatch the vaccine from the inhabitants of the poorest regions of the world,” retorts the President of the Bundestag, Wolfgang Schaüble, to those who demand that Germany be a priority to receive the vaccine developed by the German BioNTech.

Germany will be able to bet, according to the Ministry of Health, on a combined total of more than 140 million doses of BioNTech and Moderna vaccines. Some 670,000 doses are expected to be delivered on January 8 by BioNTech.

The government is also examining the possibility of maximizing the period between the two injections to allow more patients to be vaccinated before stocks run out.

Georgia Headline USA Politics

Donald Trump tried to call Brad Raffensperger 18 times but kept getting treated as a PRANK CALLER

The Washington Post published the full transcript of the call between Donald Trump and Georgia’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, which has led to calls for Trump to face a criminal probe, accused by two House Democrats of conspiracy to interfere in elections.

On the call on Saturday January 2 were Trump, his chief of staff Mark Meadows, and Republican attorneys Cleta Mitchell and Kurt Hilbert, and from Georgia Raffesnperger and his general counsel Ryan Germany. Not on the call but mentioned was Georgia Governor Brian Kemp.

Here is the full transcript: 

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows: Okay. Alright. Mr. President, everyone is on the line. This is Mark Meadows, the chief of staff. Just so we all are aware. On the line is secretary of state and two other individuals. Jordan and Mr. Germany with him. You also have the attorneys that represent the president, Kurt and Alex and Cleta Mitchell — who is not the attorney of record but has been involved — myself and then the president. So Mr. President, I’ll turn it over to you. 

President Donald Trump: Okay, thank you very much. Hello Brad and Ryan and everybody. We appreciate the time and the call. So we’ve spent a lot of time on this, and if we could just go over some of the numbers, I think it’s pretty clear that we won. We won very substantially in Georgia. You even see it by rally size, frankly. We’d be getting 25-30,000 people a rally, and the competition would get less than 100 people. And it never made sense.

But we have a number of things. We have at least 2 or 3 — anywhere from 250 to 300,000 ballots were dropped mysteriously into the rolls. Much of that had to do with Fulton County, which hasn’t been checked. We think that if you check the signatures — a real check of the signatures going back in Fulton County — you’ll find at least a couple of hundred thousand of forged signatures of people who have been forged. And we are quite sure that’s going to happen.

Georgia's Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger

Donald Trump (left) pressured Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (right) to ‘find’ enough votes to overturn Joe Biden’s win in the Peach State during an extraordinary leaked phone call on Saturday

Another tremendous number. We’re going to have an accurate number over the next two days with certified accountants. But an accurate number will be given, but it’s in the 50s of thousands — and that’s people that went to vote and they were told they can’t vote because they’ve already been voted for. And it’s a very sad thing. They walked out complaining. But the number’s large. We’ll have it for you. But it’s much more than the number of 11,779 that’s — the current margin is only 11,779. Brad, I think you agree with that, right? That’s something I think everyone — at least that’s a number that everyone agrees on.

But that’s the difference in the votes. But we’ve had hundreds of thousands of ballots that we’re able to actually — we’ll get you a pretty accurate number. You don’t need much of a number because the number that in theory I lost by, the margin would be 11,779. But you also have a substantial numbers of people, thousands and thousands, who went to the voting place on November 3, were told they couldn’t vote, were told they couldn’t vote because a ballot had been put on their name. And you know that’s very, very, very, very sad.

We had, I believe it’s about 4,502 voters who voted but who weren’t on the voter registration list, so it’s 4,502 who voted, but they weren’t on the voter registration roll, which they had to be. You had 18,325 vacant address voters. The address was vacant, and they’re not allowed to be counted. That’s 18,325.

Smaller number — you had 904 who only voted where they had just a P.O. — a post office box number — and they had a post office box number, and that’s not allowed. We had at least 18,000 — that’s on tape, we had them counted very painstakingly — 18,000 voters having to do with [name]. She’s a vote scammer, a professional vote scammer and hustler [name]. That was the tape that’s been shown all over the world that makes everybody look bad, you, me and everybody else.

Where they got — number one they said very clearly and it’s been reported that they said there was a major water main break. Everybody fled the area. And then they came back, [name] and her daughter and a few people. There were no Republican poll watchers. Actually, there were no Democrat poll watchers, I guess they were them. But there were no Democrats, either, and there was no law enforcement. Late in the morning, early in the morning, they went to the table with the black robe and the black shield, and they pulled out the votes. Those votes were put there a number of hours before — the table was put there — I think it was, Brad, you would know, it was probably eight hours or seven hours before, and then it was stuffed with votes.

They weren’t in an official voter box; they were in what looked to be suitcases or trunks, suitcases, but they weren’t in voter boxes. The minimum number it could be because we watched it, and they watched it certified in slow motion instant replay if you can believe it, but slow motion, and it was magnified many times over, and the minimum it was 18,000 ballots, all for Biden.

You had out-of-state voters. They voted in Georgia, but they were from out of state, of 4,925. You had absentee ballots sent to vacant, they were absentee ballots sent to vacant addresses. They had nothing on them about addresses, that’s 2,326.

And you had dropboxes, which is very bad. You had dropboxes that were picked up. We have photographs, and we have affidavits from many people.

I don’t know if you saw the hearings, but you have dropboxes where the box was picked up but not delivered for three days. So all sorts of things could have happened to that box, including, you know, putting in the votes that you wanted. So there were many infractions, and the bottom line is, many, many times the 11,779 margin that they said we lost by — we had vast, I mean the state is in turmoil over this.

And I know you would like to get to the bottom of it, although I saw you on television today, and you said that you found nothing wrong. I mean, you know, and I didn’t lose the state, Brad. People have been saying that it was the highest vote ever. There was no way. A lot of the political people said that there’s no way they beat me. And they beat me. They beat me in the . . . As you know, every single state, we won every state. We won every statehouse in the country. We held the Senate, which is shocking to people, although we’ll see what happens tomorrow or in a few days.

And we won the House, but we won every single statehouse, and we won Congress, which was supposed to lose 15 seats, and they gained, I think 16 or 17 or something. I think there’s a now difference of five. There was supposed to be a difference substantially more. But politicians in every state, but politicians in Georgia have given affidavits and are going to that, that there was no way that they beat me in the election, that the people came out, in fact, they were expecting to lose, and then they ended up winning by a lot because of the coattails. And they said there’s no way, that they’ve done many polls prior to the election, that there was no way that they won.

Ballots were dropped in massive numbers. And we’re trying to get to those numbers and we will have them.

They’ll take a period of time. Certified. But but they’re massive numbers. And far greater than the 11,779.

The other thing, dead people. So dead people voted, and I think the number is close to 5,000 people. And they went to obituaries. They went to all sorts of methods to come up with an accurate number, and a minimum is close to about 5,000 voters.

The bottom line is, when you add it all up and then you start adding, you know, 300,000 fake ballots. Then the other thing they said is in Fulton County and other areas. And this may or may not be true . . . this just came up this morning, that they are burning their ballots, that they are shredding, shredding ballots and removing equipment. They’re changing the equipment on the Dominion machines and, you know, that’s not legal.

And they supposedly shredded I think they said 300 pounds of, 3,000 pounds of ballots. And that just came to us as a report today. And it is a very sad situation.

But Brad, if you took the minimum numbers where many, many times above the 11,779, and many of those numbers are certified, or they will be certified, but they are certified. And those are numbers that are there, that exist. And that beat the margin of loss, they beat it, I mean, by a lot, and people should be happy to have an accurate count instead of an election where there’s turmoil.

I mean there’s turmoil in Georgia and other places. You’re not the only one, I mean, we have other states that I believe will be flipping to us very shortly. And this is something that — you know, as an example, I think it in Detroit, I think there’s a section, a good section of your state actually, which we’re not sure so we’re not going to report it yet. But in Detroit, we had, I think it was, 139 percent of the people voted. That’s not too good.

In Pennsylvania, they had well over 200,000 more votes than they had people voting. And that doesn’t play too well, and the legislature there is, which is Republican, is extremely activist and angry. I mean, there were other things also that were almost as bad as that. But they had as an example, in Michigan, a tremendous number of dead people that voted. I think it was, I think, Mark, it was 18,000. Some unbelievably high number, much higher than yours, you were in the 4-5,000 category.

And that was checked out laboriously by going through, by going through the obituary columns in the newspapers.

So I guess with all of it being said, Brad, the bottom line, and provisional ballots, again, you know, you’ll have to tell me about the provisional ballots, but we have a lot of people that were complaining that they weren’t able to vote because they were already voted for. These are great people.

And, you know, they were shellshocked. I don’t know if you call that provisional ballots. In some states, we had a lot of provisional ballot situations where people were given a provisional ballot because when they walked in on November 3 and they were already voted for.

So that’s it. I mean, we have many, many times the number of votes necessary to win the state. And we won the state, and we won it very substantially and easily, and we’re getting, we have, much of this is a very certified, far more certified than we need. But we’re getting additional numbers certified, too. And we’re getting pictures of dropboxes being delivered and delivered late. Delivered three days later, in some cases, plus we have many affidavits to that effect.

Meadows: So, Mr. President, if I might be able to jump in, and I’ll give Brad a chance. Mr. Secretary, obviously there is, there are allegations where we believe that not every vote or fair vote and legal vote was counted, and that’s at odds with the representation from the secretary of state’s office.

What I’m hopeful for is there some way that we can, we can find some kind of agreement to look at this a little bit more fully? You know the president mentioned Fulton County.

But in some of these areas where there seems to be a difference of where the facts seem to lead, and so Mr. Secretary, I was hopeful that, you know, in the spirit of cooperation and compromise, is there something that we can at least have a discussion to look at some of these allegations to find a path forward that’s less litigious?

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger: Well, I listened to what the president has just said. President Trump, we’ve had several lawsuits, and we’ve had to respond in court to the lawsuits and the contentions. We don’t agree that you have won. And we don’t — I didn’t agree about the 200,000 number that you’d mentioned. I’ll go through that point by point.

What we have done is we gave our state Senate about one and a half hours of our time going through the election issue by issue and then on the state House, the government affairs committee, we gave them about two and a half hours of our time, going back point by point on all the issues of contention. And then just a few days ago, we met with our U.S. congressmen, Republican congressmen, and we gave them about two hours of our time talking about this past election. Going back, primarily what you’ve talked about here focused in on primarily, I believe, is the absentee ballot process. I don’t believe that you’re really questioning the Dominion machines. Because we did a hand re-tally, a 100 percent re-tally of all the ballots, and compared them to what the machines said and came up with virtually the same result. Then we did the recount, and we got virtually the same result. So I guess we can probably take that off the table.

I don’t think there’s an issue about that.

Trump: Well, Brad. Not that there’s not an issue, because we have a big issue with Dominion in other states and perhaps in yours. But we haven’t felt we needed to go there. And just to, you know, maybe put a little different spin on what Mark is saying, Mark Meadows, yeah we’d like to go further, but we don’t really need to. We have all the votes we need.

You know, we won the state. If you took, these are the most minimal numbers, the numbers that I gave you, those are numbers that are certified, your absentee ballots sent to vacant addresses, your out-of-state voters, 4,925. You know when you add them up, it’s many more times, it’s many times the 11,779 number. So we could go through, we have not gone through your Dominion. So we can’t give them blessing. I mean, in other states, we think we found tremendous corruption with Dominion machines, but we’ll have to see.

But we only lost the state by that number, 11,000 votes, and 779. So with that being said, with just what we have, with just what we have, we’re giving you minimal, minimal numbers. We’re doing the most conservative numbers possible; we’re many times, many, many times above the margin. And so we don’t really have to, Mark, I don’t think we have to go through . . .

Meadows: Right

Trump: Because what’s the difference between winning the election by two votes and winning it by half a million votes. I think I probably did win it by half a million. You know, one of the things that happened, Brad, is we have other people coming in now from Alabama and from South Carolina and from other states, and they’re saying it’s impossible for you to have lost Georgia. We won. You know in Alabama, we set a record, got the highest vote ever. In Georgia, we set a record with a massive amount of votes. And they say it’s not possible to have lost Georgia.

And I could tell you by our rallies. I could tell you by the rally I’m having on Monday night, the place, they already have lines of people standing out front waiting. It’s just not possible to have lost Georgia. It’s not possible. When I heard it was close, I said there’s no way. But they dropped a lot of votes in there late at night. You know that, Brad. And that’s what we are working on very, very stringently. But regardless of those votes, with all of it being said, we lost by essentially 11,000 votes, and we have many more votes already calculated and certified, too.

And so I just don’t know, you know, Mark, I don’t know what’s the purpose. I won’t give Dominion a pass because we found too many bad things. But we don’t need Dominion or anything else. We have won this election in Georgia based on all of this. And there’s nothing wrong with saying that, Brad. You know, I mean, having the correct — the people of Georgia are angry. And these numbers are going to be repeated on Monday night. Along with others that we’re going to have by that time, which are much more substantial even. And the people of Georgia are angry, the people of the country are angry. And there’s nothing wrong with saying that, you know, that you’ve recalculated. Because the 2,236 in absentee ballots. I mean, they’re all exact numbers that were done by accounting firms, law firms, etc. And even if you cut ’em in half, cut ’em in half and cut ’em in half again, it’s more votes than we need. 

Raffensperger: Well, Mr. President, the challenge that you have is the data you have is wrong. We talked to the congressmen, and they were surprised.

But they — I guess there was a person named Mr. Braynard who came to these meetings and presented data, and he said that there was dead people, I believe it was upward of 5,000. The actual number were two. Two. Two people that were dead that voted. So that’s wrong.

Trump: Well, Cleta, how do you respond to that? Maybe you tell me?

Trump attorney Cleta Mitchell: Well, I would say, Mr. Secretary, one of the things that we have requested and what we said was, if you look, if you read our petition, it said that we took the names and birth years, and we had certain information available to us. We have asked from your office for records that only you have, and so we said there is a universe of people who have the same name and same birth year and died.

But we don’t have the records that you have. And one of the things that we have been suggesting formally and informally for weeks now is for you to make available to us the records that would be necessary —

Trump: But, Cleta, even before you do that, and not even including that, that’s why I hardly even included that number, although in one state, we have a tremendous amount of dead people. So I don’t know — I’m sure we do in Georgia, too. I’m sure we do in Georgia, too.

But we’re so far ahead. We’re so far ahead of these numbers, even the phony ballots of [name] , known scammer. You know the Internet? You know what was trending on the Internet? ‘Where’s [name]?’ Because they thought she’d be in jail. ‘Where’s [name]?’ It’s crazy, it’s crazy. That was. The minimum number is 18,000 for [name] , but they think it’s probably about 56,000, but the minimum number is 18,000 on the [name] night where she ran back in there when everybody was gone and stuffed, she stuffed the ballot boxes. Let’s face it, Brad, I mean. They did it in slow motion replay magnified, right? She stuffed the ballot boxes. They were stuffed like nobody has ever seen them stuffed before.

So there’s a term for it when it’s a machine instead of a ballot box, but she stuffed the machine. She stuffed the ballot. Each ballot went three times, they were showing: Here’s ballot No 1. Here it is a second time, third time, next ballot.

I mean, look. Brad. We have a new tape that we’re going to release. It’s devastating. And by the way, that one event, that one event is much more than the 11,000 votes that we’re talking about. It’s, you know, that one event was a disaster. And it’s just, you know, but it was, it was something, it can’t be disputed. And again, we have a version that you haven’t seen, but it’s magnified. It’s magnified, and you can see everything. For some reason, they put it in three times, each ballot, and I don’t know why. I don’t know why three times. Why not five times, right? Go ahead.

Raffensperger: You’re talking about the State Farm video. And I think it’s extremely unfortunate that Rudy Giuliani or his people, they sliced and diced that video and took it out of context. The next day, we brought in WSB-TV, and we let them show, see the full run of tape, and what you’ll see, the events that transpired are nowhere near what was projected by, you know —

Trump: But where were the poll watchers, Brad? There were no poll watchers there. There were no Democrats or Republicans. There was no security there.

It was late in the evening, late in the, early in the morning, and there was nobody else in the room. Where were the poll watchers, and why did they say a water main broke, which they did and which was reported in the newspapers? They said they left. They ran out because of a water main break, and there was no water main. There was nothing. There was no break. There was no water main break. But we’re, if you take out everything, where were the Republican poll watchers, even where were the Democrat pollwatchers, because there were none.

And then you say, well, they left their station, you know, if you look at the tape, and this was, this was reviewed by professional police and detectives and other people, when they left in a rush, everybody left in a rush because of the water main, but everybody left in a rush. These people left their station.

When they came back, they didn’t go to their station. They went to the apron, wrapped around the table, under which were thousands and thousands of ballots in a box that was not an official or a sealed box. And then they took those. They went back to a different station. So if they would have come back, they would have walked to their station, and they would have continued to work. But they couldn’t do even that because that’s illegal, because they had no Republican pollwatchers. And remember, her reputation is — she’s known all over the Internet, Brad. She’s known all over.

I’m telling you, ‘Where’s [name] ‘ was one of the hot items . . . [name] They knew her. ‘Where’s [name]?’ So Brad, there can be no justification for that. And I, you know, I give everybody the benefit of the doubt. But that was — and Brad, why did they put the votes in three times? You know, they put ’em in three times.

Raffensperger: Mr. President, they did not put that. We did an audit of that, and we proved conclusively that they were not scanned three times.

Trump: Where was everybody else at that late time in the morning? Where was everybody? Where were the Republicans? Where were the security guards? Were the people that were there just a little while before when everyone ran out of the room. How come we had no security in the room. Why did they run to the bottom of the table? Why do they run there and just open the skirt and rip out the votes. I mean, Brad. And they were sitting there, I think for five hours or something like that, the votes.

Raffensperger: Mr. President, we’ll send you the link from WSB.

Trump: I don’t care about the link. I don’t need it. Brad, I have a much better —

Mitchell: I will tell you. I’ve seen the tape. The full tape. So has Alex. We’ve watched it. And what we saw and what we’ve confirmed in the timing is that they made everybody leave — we have sworn affidavits saying that. And then they began to process ballots. And our estimate is that there were roughly 18,000 ballots. We don’t know that. If you know that . . . 

Trump: It was 18,000 ballots, but they used each one three times.

Mitchell: Well, I don’t know about that.

Trump: I do think we had ours magnified out.

Mitchell: I’ve watched the entire tape.

Trump: Nobody can make a case for that, Brad. Nobody. I mean, look, you’d have to be a child to think anything other than that. Just a child.

Mitchell: How many ballots, Mr. Secretary, are you saying were processed then?

Raffensperger: We had GBI . . . investigate that.

Germany: We had our — this is Ryan Germany. We had our law enforcement officers talk to everyone who was, who was there after that event came to light. GBI was with them as well as FBI agents.

Trump: Well, there’s no way they could — then they’re incompetent. They’re either dishonest or incompetent, okay?

Mitchell: Well, what did they find?

Trump: There’s only two answers, dishonesty or incompetence. There’s just no way. Look. There’s no way. And on the other thing, I said too, there is no way. I mean, there’s no way that these things could have been, you know, you have all these different people that voted, but they don’t live in Georgia anymore. What was that number, Cleta? That was a pretty good number, too.

Mitchell: The number who have registered out of state after they moved from Georgia. And so they had a date when they moved from Georgia, they registered to vote out of state, and then it’s like 4,500, I don’t have that number right in front of me.

Trump: And then they came back in, and they voted.

Mitchell: And voted. Yeah.

Trump: I thought that was a large number, though. It was in the 20s.

Ryan Germany, Raffensberger’s General Counsel: We’ve been going through each of those as well, and those numbers that we got, that Ms. Mitchell was just saying, they’re not accurate. Every one we’ve been through are people that lived in Georgia, moved to a different state, but then moved back to Georgia legitimately. And in many cases —

Trump: How may people do that? They moved out, and then they said, ‘Ah, to hell with it, I’ll move back.’ You know, it doesn’t sound like a very normal . . . you mean, they moved out, and what, they missed it so much that they wanted to move back in? It’s crazy.

Germany: They moved back in years ago. This was not like something just before the election. So there’s something about that data that, it’s just not accurate.

Trump: Well, I don’t know, all I know is that it is certified. And they moved out of Georgia, and they voted. It didn’t say they moved back in, Cleta, did it?

Mitchell: No, but I mean, we’re looking at the voter registration. Again, if you have additional records, we’ve been asking for that, but you haven’t shared any of that with us. You just keep saying you investigated the allegations.

Trump: Cleta, a lot of it you don’t need to be shared. I mean, to be honest, they should share it. They should share it because you want to get to an honest election.

I won this election by hundreds of thousands of votes. There’s no way I lost Georgia. There’s no way. We won by hundreds of thousands of votes. I’m just going by small numbers, when you add them up, they’re many times the 11,000. But I won that state by hundreds of thousands of votes.

Do you think it’s possible that they shredded ballots in Fulton County? Because that’s what the rumor is. And also that Dominion took out machines. That Dominion is really moving fast to get rid of their, uh, machinery.

Do you know anything about that? Because that’s illegal, right?

Trump suggested that Raffensberger and his general counsel Ryan Germany (pictured) could be subject to criminal liability if they failed to find that thousands of ballots cast in Fulton County had been illegally destroyed - despite no evidence supporting that allegation

Trump suggested that Raffensberger and his general counsel Ryan Germany (pictured) could be subject to criminal liability if they failed to find that thousands of ballots cast in Fulton County had been illegally destroyed – despite no evidence supporting that allegation

Germany: This is Ryan Germany. No, Dominion has not moved any machinery out of Fulton County.

Trump: But have they moved the inner parts of the machines and replaced them with other parts?

Germany: No.

Trump: Are you sure, Ryan?

Germany: I’m sure. I’m sure, Mr. President.

Trump: What about, what about the ballots. The shredding of the ballots. Have they been shredding ballots?

Germany: The only investigation that we have into that — they have not been shredding any ballots. There was an issue in Cobb County where they were doing normal office shredding, getting rid of old stuff, and we investigated that. But this stuff from, you know, from you know past elections.

Trump: It doesn’t pass the smell test because we hear they’re shredding thousands and thousands of ballots, and now what they’re saying, ‘Oh, we’re just cleaning up the office.’ You know.

Raffensperger: Mr. President, the problem you have with social media, they — people can say anything.

Trump: Oh this isn’t social media. This is Trump media. It’s not social media. It’s really not; it’s not social media. I don’t care about social media. I couldn’t care less. Social media is Big Tech. Big Tech is on your side, you know. I don’t even know why you have a side because you should want to have an accurate election. And you’re a Republican.

Raffensperger: We believe that we do have an accurate election.

Trump: No, no you don’t. No, no you don’t. You don’t have. Not even close. You’re off by hundreds of thousands of votes. And just on the small numbers, you’re off on these numbers, and these numbers can’t be just — well, why wont? — Okay. So you sent us into Cobb County for signature verification, right? You sent us into Cobb County, which we didn’t want to go into. And you said it would be open to the public. So we had our experts there, they weren’t allowed into the room. But we didn’t want Cobb County. We wanted Fulton County. And you wouldn’t give it to us. Now, why aren’t we doing signature — and why can’t it be open to the public?

And why can’t we have professionals do it instead of rank amateurs who will never find anything and don’t want to find anything? They don’t want to find, you know they don’t want to find anything. Someday you’ll tell me the reason why, because I don’t understand your reasoning, but someday you’ll tell me the reason why. But why don’t you want to find?

Germany: Mr. President, we chose Cobb County —

Trump: Why don’t you want to find . . . What?

Germany: Sorry, go ahead.

Trump: So why did you do Cobb County? We didn’t even request — we requested Fulton County, not Cobb County. Go ahead, please. Go ahead.

Germany: We chose Cobb County because that was the only county where there’s been any evidence submitted that the signature verification was not properly done.

Trump: No, but I told you. We’re not, we’re not saying that.

Mitchell: We did say that.

Trump: Fulton County. Look. Stacey, in my opinion, Stacey is as dishonest as they come. She has outplayed you . . . at everything. She got you to sign a totally unconstitutional agreement, which is a disastrous agreement. You can’t check signatures. I can’t imagine you’re allowed to do harvesting, I guess, in that agreement. That agreement is a disaster for this country. But she got you somehow to sign that thing, and she has outsmarted you at every step.

And I hate to imagine what’s going to happen on Monday or Tuesday, but it’s very scary to people. You know, when the ballots flow in out of nowhere. It’s very scary to people. That consent decree is a disaster. It’s a disaster. A very good lawyer who examined it said they’ve never seen anything like it.

Raffensperger: Harvesting is still illegal in the state of Georgia. And that settlement agreement did not change that one iota.

Trump: It’s not a settlement agreement, it’s a consent decree. It even says consent decree on it, doesn’t it? It uses the term consent decree. It doesn’t say settlement agreement. It’s a consent decree. It’s a disaster.

Raffensperger: It’s a settlement agreement.

Trump: What’s written on top of it?

Raffensperger: Ryan?

Germany: I don’t have it in front of me, but it was not entered by the court, it’s not a court order.

Trump: But Ryan, it’s called a consent decree, is that right? On the paper. Is that right?

Germany: I don’t. I don’t. I don’t believe so, but I don’t have it in front of me. 

Trump: Okay, whatever, it’s a disaster. It’s a disaster. Look. Here’s the problem. We can go through signature verification, and we’ll find hundreds of thousands of signatures, if you let us do it. And the only way you can do it, as you know, is to go to the past. But you didn’t do that in Cobb County. You just looked at one page compared to another. The only way you can do a signature verification is go from the one that signed it on November whatever. Recently. And compare it to two years ago, four years ago, six years ago, you know, or even one. And you’ll find that you have many different signatures. But in Fulton, where they dumped ballots, you will find that you have many that aren’t even signed and you have many that are forgeries.

Okay, you know that. You know that. You have no doubt about that. And you will find you will be at 11,779 within minutes because Fulton County is totally corrupt, and so is she totally corrupt.

And they’re going around playing you and laughing at you behind your back, Brad, whether you know it or not, they’re laughing at you. And you’ve taken a state that’s a Republican state, and you’ve made it almost impossible for a Republican to win because of cheating, because they cheated like nobody’s ever cheated before. And I don’t care how long it takes me, you know, we’re going to have other states coming forward — pretty good.

But I won’t . . . this is never . . . this is . . . We have some incredible talent said they’ve never seen anything . . . Now the problem is they need more time for the big numbers. But they’re very substantial numbers. But I think you’re going to fine that they — by the way, a little information — I think you’re going to find that they are shredding ballots because they have to get rid of the ballots because the ballots are unsigned. The ballots are corrupt, and they’re brand new, and they don’t have seals, and there’s a whole thing with the ballots. But the ballots are corrupt.

And you are going to find that they are — which is totally illegal — it is more illegal for you than it is for them because, you know, what they did and you’re not reporting it. That’s a criminal, that’s a criminal offense. And you can’t let that happen. That’s a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer. And that’s a big risk. But they are shredding ballots, in my opinion, based on what I’ve heard. And they are removing machinery, and they’re moving it as fast as they can, both of which are criminal finds. And you can’t let it happen, and you are letting it happen. You know, I mean, I’m notifying you that you’re letting it happen. So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state.

And flipping the state is a great testament to our country because, you know, this is — it’s a testament that they can admit to a mistake or whatever you want to call it. If it was a mistake, I don’t know. A lot of people think it wasn’t a mistake. It was much more criminal than that. But it’s a big problem in Georgia, and it’s not a problem that’s going away. I mean, you know, it’s not a problem that’s going away.

Germany: This is Ryan. We’re looking into every one of those things that you mentioned.

Trump: Good. But if you find it, you’ve got to say it, Ryan.

Germany: . . . Let me tell you what we are seeing. What we’re seeing is not at all what you’re describing. These are investigators from our office, these are investigators from GBI, and they’re looking, and they’re good. And that’s not what they’re seeing. And we’ll keep looking, at all these things.

Trump: Well, you better check on the ballots because they are shredding ballots, Ryan. I’m just telling you, Ryan. They’re shredding ballots. And you should look at that very carefully. Because that’s so illegal. You know, you may not even believe it because it’s so bad. But they’re shredding ballots because they think we’re going to eventually get there . . . because we’ll eventually get into Fulton. In my opinion, it’s never too late. . . . So, that’s the story. Look, we need only 11,000 votes. We have are far more than that as it stands now. We’ll have more and more. And . . . do you have provisional ballots at all, Brad? Provisional ballots?

Raffensperger: Provisional ballots are allowed by state law.

Trump: Sure, but I mean, are they counted, or did you just hold them back because they, you know, in other words, how many provisional ballots do you have in the state?

Raffensperger: We’ll get you that number.

Trump: Because most of them are made out to the name Trump. Because these are people that were scammed when they came in. And we have thousands of people that have testified or that want to testify. When they came in, they were proudly going to vote on November 3. And they were told, ‘I’m sorry, you’ve already been voted for, you’ve already voted.’ The women, men started screaming, ‘No. I proudly voted till November 3.’ They said, ‘I’m sorry, but you’ve already been voted for, and you have a ballot.’ And these people are beside themselves. So they went out, and they filled in a provisional ballot, putting the name Trump on it.

And what about that batch of military ballots that came in. And even though I won the military by a lot, it was 100 percent Trump. I mean 100 percent Biden. Do you know about that? A large group of ballots came in, I think it was to Fulton County, and they just happened to be 100 percent for Trump — for Biden — even though Trump won the military by a lot, you know, a tremendous amount. But these ballots were 100 percent for Biden. And do you know about that? A very substantial number came in, all for Biden. Does anybody know about it?

Mitchell: I know about it, but —

Trump: Okay, Cleta, I’m not asking you, Cleta, honestly. I’m asking Brad. Do you know about the military ballots that we have confirmed now. Do you know about the military ballots that came in that were 100 percent, I mean 100 percent, for Biden. Do you know about that?

Germany: I don’t know about that. I do know that we have, when military ballots come in, it’s not just military, it’s also military and overseas citizens. The military part of that does generally go Republican. The overseas citizen part of it generally goes very Democrat. This was a mix of ’em.

Trump: No, but this was. That’s okay. But I got like 78 percent of the military. These ballots were all for . . . They didn’t tell me overseas. Could be overseas, too, but I get votes overseas, too, Ryan, in all fairness. No they came in, a large batch came in, and it was, quote, 100 percent for Biden. And that is criminal. You know, that’s criminal. Okay. That’s another criminal, that’s another of the many criminal events, many criminal events here.

I don’t know, look, Brad. I got to get . . . I have to find 12,000 votes, and I have them times a lot. And therefore, I won the state. That’s before we go to the next step, which is in the process of right now. You know, and I watched you this morning, and you said, well, there was no criminality.

But I mean all of this stuff is very dangerous stuff. When you talk about no criminality, I think it’s very dangerous for you to say that.

I just, I just don’t know why you don’t want to have the votes counted as they are. Like even you when you went and did that check. And I was surprised because, you know . . . And we found a few thousand votes that were against me. I was actually surprised because the way that check was done, all you’re doing, you know, recertifying existing votes and, you know, and you were given votes and you just counted them up, and you still found 3,000 that were bad. So that was sort of surprising that it came down to three or five, I don’t know. Still a lot of votes. But you have to go back to check from past years with respect to signatures. And if you check with Fulton County, you’ll have hundreds of thousands because they dumped ballots into Fulton County and the other county next to it.

So what are we going to do here, folks? I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break. You know, we have that in spades already. Or we can keep it going, but that’s not fair to the voters of Georgia because they’re going to see what happened, and they’re going to see what happened. I mean, I’ll, I’ll take on anybody you want with regard to [name] and her lovely daughter, a very lovely young lady, I’m sure. But, but [name] . . . I will take on anybody you want. And the minimum, there were 18,000 ballots, but they used them three times. So that’s, you know, a lot of votes. And they were all to Biden, by the way, that’s the other thing we didn’t say. You know, [name] , the one thing I forgot to say, which was the most important. You know that every single ballot she did went to Biden. You know that, right? Do you know that, by the way, Brad?

Every single ballot that she did through the machines at early, early in the morning went to Biden. Did you know that, Ryan?

Germany: That’s not accurate, Mr. President.

Trump: Huh. What is accurate?

Germany: The numbers that we are showing are accurate.

Trump: No, about [name] . About early in the morning, Ryan. Where the woman took, you know, when the whole gang took the stuff from under the table, right? Do you know, do you know who those ballots, do you know who they were made out to, do you know who they were voting for?

Germany: No, not specifically.

Trump: Did you ever check?

Germany: We did what I described to you earlier —

Trump: No no no — did you ever check the ballots that were scanned by [name] , a known political operative, balloteer? Did ever check who those votes were for?

Germany: We looked into that situation that you described.

Trump: No, they were 100 percent for Biden. 100 percent. There wasn’t a Trump vote in the whole group. Why don’t you want to find this, Ryan? What’s wrong with you? I heard your lawyer is very difficult, actually, but I’m sure you’re a good lawyer. You have a nice last name.

But, but I’m just curious, why wouldn’t, why do you keep fighting this thing? It just doesn’t make sense. We’re way over the 17,779, right? We’re way over that number, and just if you took just [name] , we’re over that number by five, five or six times when you multiply that times three.

And every single ballot went to Biden, and you didn’t know that, but now you know it. So tell me, Brad, what are we going to do? We won the election, and it’s not fair to take it away from us like this. And it’s going to be very costly in many ways. And I think you have to say that you’re going to reexamine it, and you can reexamine it, but reexamine it with people that want to find answers, not people that don’t want to find answers. For instance, I’m hearing Ryan that he’s probably, I’m sure a great lawyer and everything, but he’s making statements about those ballots that he doesn’t know. But he’s making them with such — he did make them with surety. But now I think he’s less sure because the answer is, they all went to Biden, and that alone wins us the election by a lot. You know, so.

Raffensperger: Mr. President, you have people that submit information, and we have our people that submit information. And then it comes before the court, and the court then has to make a determination. We have to stand by our numbers. We believe our numbers are right.

Trump: Why do you say that, though? I don’t know. I mean, sure, we can play this game with the courts, but why do you say that? First of all, they don’t even assign us a judge. They don’t even assign us a judge. But why wouldn’t you . . . Hey Brad, why wouldn’t you want to check out [name] ? And why wouldn’t you want to say, hey, if in fact, President Trump is right about that, then he wins the state of Georgia, just that one incident alone without going through hundreds of thousands of dropped ballots. You just say, you stick by, I mean I’ve been watching you, you know, you don’t care about anything. ‘Your numbers are right.’ But your numbers aren’t right. They’re really wrong, and they’re really wrong, Brad. And I know this phone call is going nowhere other than, other than ultimately, you know — Look, ultimately, I win, okay? Because you guys are so wrong. And you treated this. You treated the population of Georgia so badly. You, between you and your governor, who is down at 21, he was down 21 points. And like a schmuck, I endorsed him, and he got elected, but I will tell you, he is a disaster.

The people are so angry in Georgia, I can’t imagine he’s ever getting elected again, I’ll tell you that much right now. But why wouldn’t you want to find the right answer, Brad, instead of keep saying that the numbers are right? ‘Cause those numbers are so wrong?

Mitchell: Mr. Secretary, Mr. President, one of the things that we have been, Alex can talk about this, we talked about it, and I don’t know whether the information has been conveyed to your office, but I think what the president is saying, and what we’ve been trying to do is to say, look, the court is not acting on our petition. They haven’t even assigned a judge. But the people of Georgia and the people of America have a right to know the answers. And you have data and records that we don’t have access to.

And you can keep telling us and making public statement that you investigated this and nothing to see here. But we don’t know about that. All we know is what you tell us. What I don’t understand is why wouldn’t it be in everyone’s best interest to try to get to the bottom, compare the numbers, you know, if you say, because . . . to try to be able to get to the truth because we don’t have any way of confirming what you’re telling us. You tell us that you had an investigation at the State Farm Arena. I don’t have any report. I’ve never seen a report of investigation. I don’t know that is. I’ve been pretty involved in this, and I don’t know. And that’s just one of 25 categories. And it doesn’t even. And as I, as the president said, we haven’t even gotten into the Dominion issue. That’s not part of our case. It’s not part of, we just didn’t feel as though we had any to be able to develop —

Trump: No, we do have a way, but I don’t want to get into it. We found a way . . . excuse me, but we don’t need it because we’re only down 11,000 votes, so we don’t even need it. I personally think they’re corrupt as hell. But we don’t need that. All we have to do, Cleta, is find 11,000-plus votes. So we don’t need that. I’m not looking to shake up the whole world. We won Georgia easily. We won it by hundreds of thousands of votes. But if you go by basic, simple numbers, we won it easily, easily. So we’re not giving Dominion a pass on the record. We don’t need Dominion because we have so many other votes that we don’t need to prove it any more than we already have.

Trump attorney Kurt Hilbert: Mr. President and Cleta, this is Kurt Hilbert, if I might interject for a moment. Ryan, I would like to suggest that just four categories that have already been mentioned by the president that have actually hard numbers of 24,149 votes that were counted illegally. That in and of itself is sufficient to change the results or place the outcome in doubt. We would like to sit down with your office, and we can do it through purposes of compromise and just like this phone call, just to deal with that limited category of votes. And if you are able to establish that our numbers are not accurate, then fine. However, we believe that they are accurate. We’ve had now three to four separate experts looking at these numbers.

Trump: Certified accountants looked at them.

Hilbert: Correct. And this is just based on USPS data and your own secretary of state data. So that’s what we would entreat and ask you to do, to sit down with us in a compromise and settlements proceeding and actually go through the registered voter IDs and the registrations. And if you can convince us that 24,149 is inaccurate, then fine. But we tend to believe that is, you know, obviously more than 11,779. That’s sufficient to change the results entirely in and of itself. So what would you say to that, Mr. Germany?

Germany: I’m happy to get with our lawyers, and we’ll set that up. That number is not accurate. And I think we can show you, for all the ones we’ve looked at, why it’s not. And so if that would be helpful, I’m happy to get with our lawyers and set that up with you guys.

Trump: Well, let me ask you, Kurt, you think that is an accurate number. That was based on the information given to you by the secretary of state’s department, right?

Hilbert: That is correct. That information is the minimum, most conservative data based upon the USPS data and the secretary of state’s office data that has been made publicly available. We do not have the internal numbers from the secretary of state. Yet we have asked for it six times. I sent a letter over to . . . several times requesting this information, and it’s been rebuffed every single time. So it stands to reason that if the information is not forthcoming, there’s something to hide. That’s the problem that we have.

Germany: Well, that’s not the case, sir. There are things that you guys are entitled to get. And there’s things that under law, we are not allowed to give out.

Trump: Well, you have to. Well, under law, you’re not allowed to give faulty election results, okay? You’re not allowed to do that. And that’s what you done. This is a faulty election result. And honestly, this should go very fast. You should meet tomorrow because you have a big election coming up, and because of what you’ve done to the president — you know, the people of Georgia know that this was a scam — and because of what you’ve done to the president, a lot of people aren’t going out to vote. And a lot of Republicans are going to vote negative because they hate what you did to the president. Okay? They hate it. And they’re going to vote. And you would be respected. Really respected, if this thing could be straightened out before the election. You have a big election coming up on Tuesday. And I think that it is really is important that you meet tomorrow and work out on these numbers. Because I know, Brad, that if you think we’re right, I think you’re going to say, and I’m not looking to blame anybody, I’m just saying, you know, and, you know, under new counts, and under new views, of the election results, we won the election. You know? It’s very simple. We won the election. As the governors of major states and the surrounding states said, there is no way you lost Georgia. As the Georgia politicians say, there is no way you lost Georgia. Nobody. Everyone knows I won it by hundreds of thousands of votes. But I’ll tell you it’s going to have a big impact on Tuesday if you guys don’t get this thing straightened out fast.

Meadows: Mr. President, this is Mark. It sounds like we’ve got two different sides agreeing that we can look at those areas, and I assume that we can do that within the next 24 to 48 hours, to go ahead and get that reconciled so that we can look at the two claims and making sure that we get the access to the secretary of state’s data to either validate or invalidate the claims that have been made. Is that correct?

Germany: No, that’s not what I said. I’m happy to have our lawyers sit down with Kurt and the lawyers on that side and explain to him, hey, here’s, based on what we’ve looked at so far, here’s how we know this is wrong, this is wrong, this is wrong, this is wrong, this is wrong.

Meadows: So what you’re saying, Ryan, let me let me make sure . . . so what you’re saying is you really don’t want to give access to the data. You just want to make another case on why the lawsuit is wrong?

Germany: I don’t think we can give access to data that’s protected by law. But we can sit down with them and say —

Trump: But you’re allowed to have a phony election? You’re allowed to have a phony election, right?

Germany: No, sir.

Trump: When are you going to do signature counts, when are you going to do signature verification on Fulton County, which you said you were going to do, and now all of a sudden, you’re not doing it. When are you doing that?

Germany: We are going to do that. We’ve announced —

Hilbert: To get to this issue of the personal information and privacy issue, is it possible that the secretary of state could deputize the lawyers for the president so that we could access that information and private information without you having any kind of violation?

Trump: Well, I don’t want to know who it is. You guys can do it very confidentially. You can sign a confidentiality agreement. That’s okay. I don’t need to know names. But on this stuff that we’re talking about, we got all that information from the secretary of state.

Meadows: Yeah. So let me let me recommend, Ryan, if you and Kurt will get together, you know, when we get off of this phone call, if you could get together and work out a plan to address some of what we’ve got with your attorneys where we can we can actually look at the data. For example, Mr. Secretary, I can you say they were only two dead people who would vote. I can promise you there are more than that. And that may be what your investigation shows, but I can promise you there are more than that. But at the same time, I think it’s important that we go ahead and move expeditiously to try to do this and resolve it as quickly as we possibly can. And if that’s the good next step. Hopefully we can, we can finish this phone call and go ahead and agree that the two of you will get together immediately.

Trump: Well, why don’t my lawyers show you where you got the information. It will show the secretary of state, and you don’t even have to look at any names. We don’t want names. We don’t care. But we got that information from you. And Stacey Abrams is laughing about you. She’s going around saying these guys are dumber than a rock. What she’s done to this party is unbelievable, I tell you. And I only ran against her once. And that was with a guy named Brian Kemp, and I beat her. And if I didn’t run, Brian wouldn’t have had even a shot, either in the general or in the primary. He was dead, dead as a doornail. He never thought he had a shot at either one of them. What a schmuck I was. But that’s the way it is. That’s the way it is. I would like you . . . for the attorneys . . . I’d like you to perhaps meet with Ryan, ideally tomorrow, because I think we should come to a resolution of this before the election. Otherwise you’re going to have people just not voting. They don’t want to vote. They hate the state, they hate the governor, and they hate the secretary of state. I will tell you that right now. The only people that like you are people that will never vote for you. You know that, Brad, right? They like you, you know, they like you. They can’t believe what they found. They want more people like you. So, look, can you get together tomorrow? And, Brad, we just want the truth. It’s simple.

And everyone’s going to look very good if the truth comes out. It’s okay. It takes a little while, but let the truth come out. And the real truth is, I won by 400,000 votes. At least. That’s the real truth. But we don’t need 400,000 votes. We need less than 2,000 votes. And are you guys able to meet tomorrow, Ryan?

Germany: I’ll get with Chris, the lawyer who’s representing us in the case, and see when he can get together with Kurt.

Raffensperger: Ryan will be in touch with the other attorney on this call, Mr. Meadows. Thank you, President Trump, for your time.

Trump: Okay, thank you, Brad. Thank you, Ryan. Thank you. Thank you, everybody. Thank you very much. Bye.  


Headline USA

Biscuit maker in Germany has been making their products with sawdust for 20 years and only now they ban them | The State

A producer manufactured and sold biscuits made with sawdust for 20 years. The natural products trader who filled his mail orders in Germany. The authorities of the city of Karlsruhe decided to prohibit the biscuit maker from selling his products made with the “ingredient” from wood.

According to the German press, non-medical websites advertise fine wood waste, for supposedly cleanse the intestines, supposedly strengthen the intestines and they loosen the old stool.

The manufacturer claimed in its defense in court that it is a traditional vegetable product. In times of need, he used sawdust to replace flour in food. He also pointed out that it was a herbal product and that it only used flour microbiologically perfect wood.

Sawdust is not even used in animal feed

Cookies should not be marketed because they are not safe food, but objectively they are not suitable for human consumption. The sawdust used is a filler that it is not even used in the animal feed sector, says the Karlsruhe Administrative Court in a statement.

The cookie container does not hide that they contain sawdust. The manufacturer had buyers for its product and has been running a mail order business throughout Germany. In 2004 he had written to the city of Karlsruhe about his practice, but no one said anything. In 2017, the city conducted a routine cookie overhaul and subsequently banned it from marketing them.

The merchant took legal action and the matter went to court. The sawdust biscuit maker’s lawsuits have been dismissed by the court. The verdict is not yet legally binding.

Sawdust is not included in the positive list of approved novel foods according to the so-called novel foods regulation of the European Union. There is no evidence of any significant use of sawdust for human consumption in the European Union and no history of use as a safe food.

Wood in food

According to The Corncopia Institute, cellulose from wood pulp has no nutritional benefit, but it is used in many foods as a filler or to prevent pieces of cheese from sticking and can be used in certified organic foods.

Around the year 1700, wheat was in short supply in Britain, but sawdust was everywhere. When millers and bakers were looking for an inexpensive way to make bread for the poor, there were those who came up with combining flour with sawdust.

The United States did not have the same problems with sawdust in bread as Europe because wheat was so plentiful, said Penn State food historian Bryan McDonald.


Cellulose in food it is not necessarily wood pulp. The most commonly used type of cellulose in food products is a common plant derivative with uses ranging from adding fiber to foods to preventing caking.

The FDA includes cellulose gel as a common food ingredient, used as a fat replacement.

It may interest you:


Headline USA Sports USA

An impossible dream? In Germany they laugh at the signing of Erling Haaland by Barcelona | The State

The Norwegian striker from Borussia Dortmund, Erling Haaland, captured all eyes as far as new promises of world football are concerned; his average of goals per game borders on the inhuman and his youth makes him the most sought-after signing in international football, but – despite all the rumors – there is a small detail: Haaland has a current contract.

The German media have reacted with skepticism and even mockery before the electoral promise of Emili Rousaud, candidate for the presidency of FC Barcelona and who seeks to use the hiring of the forward to reach the position in the elections of January 24.

“Apparently the first thing that Rousaud would have to do if elected would be to break an electoral promise”, the magazine concludes Sport Bild who has listed several reasons to explain his skepticism:

First, the magazine recalls that Haaland’s contract with Dortmund is valid until 2024 and an alleged buyout clause of more than $ 80 million, so far not confirmed by the club and which would come into effect in the summer of 2023. Before then Dortmund would only let Haaland go for a monstrous amount of money.

Dortmund’s toughness on negotiation issues is clear, especially for Barcelona, ​​who have already squeezed every last drop with the signing of Ousmane Dembelé.

Also, remember that diary, Barcelona’s financial situation is not good with what basically is “unlikely” that he has the money to make an offer for the player of the moment.

“We have long-term plans with Erling and we don’t have to react to rumors”, said, for his part, the sporting director of Dortmund, Michael Zorc, without going into more German-style comments when questioned on this subject.

Spanish media they have even talked about a pre-contract between Haaland’s agent, Mino Raiola, and the candidacy of Rousaud, but according to Spor Bild, if any, it would have no legitimacy to be closed when Haaland still has a three-year contract.


Headline USA New York

Genealogist confirms Hilaria Baldwin has NO Spanish roots

Hilaria Baldwin has claimed that she hails from Spain, but a genealogist has weighed in to confirm that Boston-born Hillary Thomas-Hayward is anything but Spanish.  

Genealogist Dr. Adina Newman says there is ‘no Spain in sight’ after tracing Hilaria’s lineage back to England, Ireland, Germany, Quebec, modern day Slovakia and finally settling in New England.

Nowhere in her family tree does the mother-of-five have any ties to Spain, with the only connection being vacationing in the European country during her childhood and her parents retiring to the island of Majorca in 2011. 

Speaking to, Dr. Adina said ‘nothing led me to Spain’ after fleshing out a ‘dirty tree’ going back centuries on her Hilaria’s maternal side. 

This comes as has discovered Hilaria was still embracing her true self on her MySpace page, showing sultry selfies and proudly displaying her given name Hillary Hayward-Thomas. has discovered Hilaria proudly displayed her given name Hillary Hayward-Thomas on her MySpace page alongside sultry selfies

On an old MySpace page unearthed by, Hilaria used her given name Hillary, which she attempted to explain by saying she used Hillary in the US and Hilaria in Spain

On an old MySpace page unearthed by, Hilaria used her given name Hillary, which she attempted to explain by saying she used Hillary in the US and Hilaria in Spain

On an old MySpace page unearthed by, Hilaria used her given name Hillary, which she attempted to explain by saying she used Hillary in the US and Hilaria in Spain

In 2014 Hilaria posted this photo with a flamenco fan and posing in front of a torrero statue with the caption: 'Hoping one day we all just dance with the bulls'

In 2014 Hilaria posted this photo with a flamenco fan and posing in front of a torrero statue with the caption: ‘Hoping one day we all just dance with the bulls’ 

Hilaria's parents, although they retired to Spain in 2011, spent a majority of their lives in the US

Hilaria’s parents, although they retired to Spain in 2011, spent a majority of their lives in the US

Hilaria’s parents, although they retired to Spain in 2011, spent a majority of their lives in the US. While Hilaria has long described her mother as Spanish, records revealed that Dr. Kathryn Hayward is in fact a fourth-generation Massachusetts resident. 

According to Dr. Adina, ‘Hilaria’s maternal ancestry appears to hail from England, Ireland, Germany, Quebec (French), and modern day Slovakia.’

Dr. Adina has traced her roots back centuries to the first Haywards who arrived from England to Connecticut ‘sometime in the 1870s, but no later than around 1874’. 

Genealogist Dr. Adina Newman says there is 'no Spain in sight' after tracing her lineage back to England, Ireland, Germany, Quebec, and Slovakia

Genealogist Dr. Adina Newman says there is ‘no Spain in sight’ after tracing her lineage back to England, Ireland, Germany, Quebec, and Slovakia

Her mother, Dr. Hayward, was born in New York. Her parents and Hilaria’s maternal grandparents, Charles B. Hayward and Irene Webler were both born in Massachusetts. 

Hilaria’s roots are so deep in New England, her 11th great-grandfather Jon Brockett was a founder of New Haven, Connecticut, according to Dr. Adina. 

Her attorney father David Thomas has even deeper ties to the US, having lived here since before the American Revolution.   

On her father’s side, Hilaria’s grandmother was from Kansas, according to a marriage certificate. 

Ironically, genealogy appears to be important to Hilaria’s family, as her paternal grandmother was the head librarian of the New York Genealogical and Biographical Society.  

And despite his daughter’s claims, her father David was quoted once saying he doesn’t have ‘an iota of Latin blood in my veins.’   

Hilaria finally admitted in a rambling video over the weekend that her real name is Hillary, she was born in Boston, she only spent ‘some of’ her childhood in Spain and clarified she is ‘a white girl.’

But it wasn’t before the 36-year-old came under fire for giving countless interviews where she boasts of her childhood and family living in Majorca, claiming she moved to the US when she was 19 to attend New York University. 

She went as far as speaking with a Spanish accent and once forgot the English word for ‘cucumber’ on live TV for a cooking segment.  

'So cringe': Hilaria later shared on Instagram never-before-seen snaps of herself in Spain

Hilaria never posts about her being in the country or visiting family there

‘So cringe’: Hilaria later shared on Instagram never-before-seen snaps of herself in Spain can reveal that she grew up in this 100-year-old $4million house in the heart of the most desirable district in Boston called Beacon Hill can reveal that she grew up in this 100-year-old $4million house in the heart of the most desirable district in Boston called Beacon Hill revealed that Hilaria grew up in a 100-year-old $4million house in the heart of the most desirable district in Boston, can exclusively reveal.

'It is troubling to watch people lie about what you have said and not said. You are the most principled and decent woman I have ever known,' Alec said on Instagram in support of his wife

‘It is troubling to watch people lie about what you have said and not said. You are the most principled and decent woman I have ever known,’ Alec said on Instagram in support of his wife 

Records show her parents bought the five-bed, five-bath house on Pinckney Street in June 1987 when their daughter was just three years old. They didn’t move out till she had turned 28  

And while Dr. Adina admits that genealogy is always changing, she says it’s highly unlikely that a Spanish connection was overlooked in Hilaria’s family tree, ‘unless there was an adoption.’  

On an old MySpace page unearthed by, Hilaria used her given name Hillary, which she attempted to explain by saying she used Hillary in the US and Hilaria in Spain.

‘My whole family call me Hilaria. It always kind of bothered me that neither name sounds good in the other language. So I would use one or the other one,’ she said.

‘A handful of years before I met Alec, I decided to consolidate the two…It means happy in both languages. I think we can all be really like clear that it’s the same name just a few letters difference, so I don’t think we should be upset about it.’ 

She indicated that in her youth she tried to be her ‘coolest self,’ but ‘as you get older you kind of just embrace who you are and you just kind of want to be open about it and that’s what I’m trying to do here.’

Hilaria attempted to explain the confusion on Instagram, saying: ‘Let’s be very clear that Europe has a lot of white people in there and my family is white. Ethnically, I am a mix of many, many, many things. Culturally, I grew up with two cultures so it’s really as simple as that.’ 

Hilaria incorporated several elements of the country's culture in her 175-guest wedding in June of 2012, recently noting in her explanation about her background that 44 people flew in from Spain for the event

Hilaria incorporated several elements of the country’s culture in her 175-guest wedding in June of 2012, recently noting in her explanation about her background that 44 people flew in from Spain for the event 

The Mom Brain podcaster explained: 'And I'm really lucky that I grew up speaking two different languages and I'm trying to raise my kids, so they speak two languages too. And that's something very important to me especially having my family abroad'

The Mom Brain podcaster explained: ‘And I’m really lucky that I grew up speaking two different languages and I’m trying to raise my kids, so they speak two languages too. And that’s something very important to me especially having my family abroad’

Hilaria also incorporated several elements of Spanish culture in her 175-guest wedding in June of 2012, recently noting in her explanation about her background that 44 people flew in from Spain for the event.

As for husband Alec, he is publicly backing his wife’s claims. ‘You are my life. And hard as it is now, the dog barks, but the parade goes on. I love you,’ he posted in a message to Hilaria on Instagram.

‘You never claimed you were from Spain. You always maintained you were born here,’ he wrote.

‘It is troubling to watch people lie about what you have said and not said. You are the most principled and decent woman I have ever known.

‘You are a woman born in America, raised for many years in another land and proud of your dual upbringing. You haven’t faked anything. Ever,’ he added.

He’d earlier tweeted: ‘Fake? Exaggerated? Appropriated an accent as an adult? She lived in Spain for many years as a child. She lived both places.’ 

Sports Canada

Dylan Cozens scores six points, Canada crushes Germany 16-2

Although Canada had a 10-goal lead after two periods, head coach André Tourigny was not particularly impressed with his squad’s performance coming back to the World Junior Hockey Championship.

Dylan Cozens completed his hat trick early in the third period and Canada added a total of five goals in a more satisfying engagement for their manager en route to a landslide 16-2 victory over Germany , Saturday.

Dawson Mercer, Alex Newhook, Peyton Krebs and Philip Tomasino scored two goals apiece, while Kaiden Guhle, Ryan Suzuki, Jakob Pelletier, Thomas Harley and Connor McMichael also hit the target. Cozens ended the game with six points to his record and Mercer with four.

“All lines have scored and it’s good to see that, but there will probably be some adjustments to be made in the defensive zone and the neutral zone,” said Cozens. I’m sure we’ll be revising some footage to fine-tune this. “

Canada approached its record of 18 goals in a game at the World Juniors. He accomplished this feat in December 1985 against the Federal Republic of Germany and in December 1986 against Poland.

The tournament record stands at 21 goals, when Czechoslovakia beat Austria 21-4 in December 1980.

The offensive festival did not impress Tourigny, however.

“It’s all about structure and good playing habits,” said Tourigny. We didn’t always do it in the first two periods, but I thought it was good in the third period.

“This is the time when we did the little things best, the best we did on the face-offs, the best we got in front of the opposing goalie. We did all the things necessary to win. We need to develop good habits. It was not a question of increasing the pace or humiliating the opponent. It was all about playing the right way, ”he added.

Montrealer Devon Levi, who will celebrate his 19th birthday on Sunday, allowed one goal on 10 shots in the first two periods. Dylan Garand took over in the third period and gave up once on five shots.

John-Jason Peterka and Fabian Elias were Germany’s goal scorers. Arno Tiefensee allowed four goals on 11 shots in the first period, then Jonas Gahr gave up 12 times on 33 shots in the last 40 minutes of play.

Canada lost the services of defenseman Braden Schneider after 8:40 of play. Schneider received a major penalty and game misconduct for a head check against forward Jan-Luca Schumacher.

Germany was deprived of nine players as they are in isolation after producing positive samples for COVID-19. She lost 5-3 to Finland on Friday, also with just 14 skaters in uniform.

“Yesterday, the presences on the ice were sometimes too long. We cautioned the players to be smart and to take every opportunity to make a change, noted Germany head coach Tobias Abstreiter. They did not do it. If you don’t make the right decisions, you are going to have a hard time playing. “

Defenseman Bowen Byram wore the captain’s “C” in the absence of Kirby Dach, who suffered a wrist injury in a pre-season game against Russia on Wednesday. Dach, who spent the last season in the NHL with the Chicago Blackhawks, will miss the entire tournament. Byram and Cozens will alternately wear the “C” during Canada matches.

Canada will play its next game on Sunday, against Slovakia. Germany will take over on Monday, also against Slovakia.

No surprises

Germany weren’t helped by Tiefensee in the first half. He was beaten by Guhle from a tight angle after 1:54 of play and himself caused the turnaround that led to Mercer’s first goal.

at 7:27, outnumbered.

Meanwhile, Levi had distinguished himself at the other end of the ice, stretching his left pad to frustrate Tim Stutzle after a two-on-one attack.

Germany blackened the scoresheet late in their five-minute power play after Schneider was sent off. Peterka beat Levi with a good wrist shot with 6:48 left in the first twenty. The puck deflected off Byram’s stick before surprising Levi.

Tomasino replied 68 seconds later, when Tiefensee compromised and couldn’t stop the puck.

Tiefensee then escaped a comeback and Krebs took the opportunity to score on the power play with 0.2 seconds left on the throw-off.

Gahr replaced Tiefensee in goal for Germany after the intermission, but that did nothing to slow Canada down. In contrast, the Maple Leaf representatives added seven goals in the second period.

This is the seventh time Canada has scored seven goals in a period at the World Juniors.

Mercer got the ball rolling at 2:40 am after Tomasino’s handover in the enclave.

The floodgates really opened thereafter. Suzuki, Newhook twice, and Tomasino hit the target, making it 9-1. Cozens scored on the breakaway, then Krebs returned with 9.4 seconds remaining.

Cozens quickly completed his hat trick with two salvos early in the third period. Pelletier, Harley and McMichael, outnumbered, also invited to the party with a goal each before the end.

Elias scored Germany’s second goal late in the game on the power play.