Senate battle rages for Supreme Court nomination that Trump will announce on Saturday | The NY Journal
[ad_1]
Senator Mitt Romney Supports Advancing Process to Replace Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg
The Senate faces an intense battle to attend the nomination to the Supreme Court, which will be announced on Saturday by the president Donald trump, after the honors to the judge end Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died last Friday of cancer.
The surprise of the day was given by the Republican senator Mitt romney (Utah) -a critic of President Trump-, who confirmed that he will not prevent the nomination revealed by the president, in addition to supporting the vote in plenary.
“My liberal friends have been used to the idea of having a liberal court for many decades, but that is not written in the stars.”Romney said.
He affirmed that a “center-right” country, such as the United States, should have a Supreme Court that reflects those views.
Romney’s decision, however, does not mean that he will vote in favor, but that there could be unobstructed advance in that House.
With the vote of the Utah senator, the majority of the Senate, led by Mitch McConnell (Kentucky), would have the 51 votes necessary to endorse whoever succeeds Judge Ginsburg, which has worried Democrats, who have worked to stop the process.
“I will announce my nomination to the Supreme Court on Saturday at the White House”the president wrote on Twitter.
I will be announcing my Supreme Court Nominee on Saturday, at the White House! Exact time TBA.
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 22, 2020
Although at least three names are considered, several reports indicate that the judge of the Seventh Circuit of Appeals, Amy coney barrett, is the most viable option for the president.
In addition to Barrett, President Trump considers Hispanic Judge Bárbara Lagoabut it has less chance than the first, according to reports.
Although the president is pushing for confirmation, the senators are still analyzing the options, since the credentials of whoever is nominated must be reviewed and the corresponding hearing held in the Judicial Committee.
The minority leader, Charles schumer (New York) made a motion to have his colleagues accept Judge Ginsburg’s wish to appoint his replacement after the election, but the Republican Senator Ted Cruz (Texas) blocked the request.
“I stand up now to offer a resolution that will honor your long and illustrious career. Republicans came to us with this resolution, but ignored Judge Ginsburg’s last wish, what she called her ‘most fervent wish’, not to be replaced until a new president is installed, ”said Schumer.
The Democrat criticized the Republicans for advancing in the process, in addition to considering that the replacement of Judge Ginsburg will be someone who “demolishes everything she built.”
Schumer, however, established that endorsing a proposal by President Trump would jeopardize some existing programs, such as health care.
“(It will) cause drug prices to skyrocket and remove protections for up to 130 million Americans with pre-existing conditions,” he charged. “That is what we are talking about when we talk about this vacancy. For hundreds of millions of Americans, everything is at stake. “
So far, the only Republicans who refuse to endorse President Trump’s proposal are Susan collins (Maine) and Lisa murkowski (Alaska).
The game of positions
In 2016, the Democrats sought that President Barack Obama could appoint – 70 days before the presidential election – who would replace the judge Antonin Scalia, who died that year. So Republicans said that decision should be left to whoever won the election.
“I don’t think we should go ahead with a nominee in the last year of this president’s term. I would say that even if I was a Republican president, ”the senator said in 2016. Marco Rubio (Florida).
His position was similar to that of McConnell, who even appealed that the decision was up to the voters, with a new president and the formation of a Senate.
“The American people should have a voice in selecting their next Supreme Court justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president, ”McConnel said of Judge Scalia’s vacancy.
Now the roles are reversed, but Republicans seem to have no intention of backing down, pressured by President Trump, who claims to have a constitutional right to do so, although there have been no indications that he does not.
Votes ready?
In the middle of the battle, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, the Republican Lindsey graham (South Carolina), affirmed that his bench has all the votes to approve the nomination.
“We have the votes to confirm the replacement of Judge Ginsburg before the election,” he said on Fox News. “We are going to advance the Committee, we are going to report the Committee’s nomination to the United States Senate so that we can vote before the elections. Now, that is the constitutional process ”.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
