African Football Bows to Pressure With AFCON Change; Some Say “Lack of Respect”

CAF Drops Biennial Format for AFCON, New Cycle Draws Mixed Reactions

African football’s governing body, the Confederation of African Football (CAF), has announced a major change to the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) schedule. The decision has triggered strong reactions from players, coaches and fans.

CAF confirmed that AFCON will move away from its long-standing two-year cycle and shift to a four-year format after the upcoming editions.

Details of the AFCON Schedule Change

According to CAF officials:

• The 2025 AFCON will be hosted by Morocco
• The 2027 edition will be co-hosted by Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
• One more tournament will be held in 2028
• After that, AFCON will follow a four-year cycle

The Africa Cup of Nations has been played every two years since its first edition in 1957.

Why the Decision Was Taken

CAF said the change was needed due to the crowded international football calendar. The organisation cited scheduling conflicts with:

• European domestic leagues
• FIFA tournaments such as the World Cup
• Growing demands on elite players who compete year-round

Officials said planning AFCON every two years had become increasingly difficult.

Strong Reaction From African Football Voices

The move has drawn criticism from across African football.

Several players, coaches and analysts said the decision shows African football giving in to pressure from European clubs, where many top African players are based.

Some described the change as a “lack of respect” for the continent’s flagship tournament, arguing that AFCON should not be adjusted to suit non-African interests.

Others warned that fewer tournaments could reduce competitive opportunities for national teams.

Support for the Change Also Exists

Not everyone opposes the move.

Some officials believe a four-year cycle could:

• Improve tournament planning
• Increase global attention on AFCON
• Reduce player burnout

CAF also plans to launch an African Nations League from 2029, which is expected to provide regular competitive matches and generate additional revenue.

Debate Likely to Continue

While CAF maintains the decision was necessary, the debate highlights deeper concerns about Africa’s place in global football decision-making.

For many critics, the issue is not just scheduling — but whether African football is being forced to adjust while others are not.