Headline USAPolitics

Iran to allow UN nuclear inspectors to access two suspect sites

[ad_1]

Iran agrees to allow UN nuclear inspectors to access two suspect sites – despite ‘extensive sanitization and levelling’ by Tehran rendering any such investigation useless

  • International Atomic Energy Agency said Tehran voluntarily giving access
  • UN-backed agency said it was looking at two unnamed locations in Iran
  • But in a June report, IAEA said that three sites – not two – had undergone ‘extensive sanitization and levelling’, meaning investigation was useless
  • President Hassan Rouhani heralded today’s ‘good agreement’ with the IAEA

Iran today reached an agreement for the UN nuclear watchdog to examine two sites in the country suspected of harbouring undeclared nuclear matter.

The International Atomic Energy Agency said Tehran was ‘voluntarily providing the IAEA with access to the two locations specified by the IAEA and facilitating the IAEA verification activities to resolve the issues.’ 

But in the IAEA’s report from June, the agency had referred to three sites rather than two and described how demolition and cleansing of the facilities had rendered any such investigation useless. 

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, who on Wednesday met with the IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, said the visit had produced a ‘good agreement that can help for moving on a correct and proper path and achieve the final resolution of problems.’

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani (right) meeting with Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Mariano Grossi in Tehran on Wednesday

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani (right) meeting with Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Mariano Grossi in Tehran on Wednesday

The Iranian president meeting with the boss of the IAEA - both parties agreed to end a months-long impasse, though the immediate effects of their agreement appear pointless

The Iranian president meeting with the boss of the IAEA – both parties agreed to end a months-long impasse, though the immediate effects of their agreement appear pointless

The inspections, though in effect pointless, would resolve a months-long impasse between Iran and the IAEA. 

Iran had been resisting providing access to the two sites, which are thought to be from the early 2000s, before it signed the 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, maintaining the IAEA had no legal basis to visit them.

The head of Iran’s nuclear agency, Ali Akbar Salehi, confirmed that Iran had agreed to the inspections, saying ‘this will bring the case to an end.’

‘We are loyal to conventions and our commitments,’ he said, adding that he hoped the agreement would open a new chapter between Iran and the IAEA based upon ‘good intentions and mutual acceptance.’ 

As the U.S. and others continue to put more pressure on Iran, Rouhani urged the IAEA to continue its ‘independence, impartiality and professionalism.’

Grossi told IAEA board members in March that it had ‘identified a number of questions related to possible undeclared nuclear material and nuclear-related activities at three locations that have not been declared by Iran’ and had been pressing for access.

In its report in June, the agency said it had determined that one site had undergone ‘extensive sanitization and leveling’ in 2003 and 2004 and there would be no verification value in inspecting it.

Rouhani and other officials inspect nuclear technology last year in Tehran

Rouhani and other officials inspect nuclear technology last year in Tehran

It said Iran has blocked access to the other two locations, one of which was partially demolished in 2004 and the other at which the agency observed activities ‘consistent with efforts to sanitize’ the facility from July 2019 onward.

At the same time, it emphasised that Iran had been fully providing access to sites agreed upon in the 2015 nuclear deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, with the U.S., Russia, China, Germany, France and Britain.

The nuclear deal promised Iran economic incentives in return for the curbs on its nuclear program.

President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of the deal unilaterally in 2018, saying it needed to be renegotiated.

Since then, Iran has since slowly violated the restrictions to try and pressure the remaining nations to increase the incentives to offset new, economy-crippling U.S. sanctions.

The ultimate goal of the deal is to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear bomb. Since the U.S. withdrawal, Iran has stockpiled enough uranium to produce a weapon, although the government in Tehran insists it has no such goal and that its atomic program is only for producing energy.

The other members of the accord have been struggling to keep the deal alive saying, among other things, that even though Iran has violated many parts of the deal, the ability for inspectors to continue to visit its nuclear sites is critical.

What is the Iran nuclear deal? 

The deal, signed in 2015 was an agreement between Iran and the U.S., UK, France, China, Russia and Germany that it would limit its nuclear activities and allow independent inspectors. 

Known officially as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, it would see the lifting of crippling economic sanctions if Iran stuck to the imposed limits. 

President Barack Obama said the JCPOA would prevent Iran from quickly creating a nuclear bomb

President Barack Obama said the JCPOA would prevent Iran from quickly creating a nuclear bomb

What were the key commitments in the deal? 

  • The reduction of Iran’s uranium stockpile by 98 per cent to 660lbs (300kg), which could not be exceeded until 2031. The stockpile’s enrichment had to stay at 3.67 per cent, meaning that while fuel for nuclear power plans could be produced, Iran could not produce ‘weapons-grade uranium’, which is 90 per cent enriched.
  • Iran had two nuclear facilities – Natanz and Fordo – in which there were almost 20,000 centrifuges. Under the deal, it was limited to installing no more than 5,060 of the least efficient and oldest at Natanz until 2026. This was ten years after the ‘implementation day’ in January 2016. By January 2016, Iran had drastically reduced the number of centrifuges at Natanz and Fordo, with tonnes of low grade Uranium sent to Russia.
  •  The country’s ability to build weapons using plutonium was also removed by the redesign of the only reactor which could have carried out the process. 
  •  Iran would not be able to build any further heavy-water reactors, meaning that it 
  • The International Atomic Energy Agency was granted regular access to all Iranian nuclear facilities to ensure that Iran kept to its side of the arrangement.   

What did Iran get in return? 

Sanctions which had been imposed as a result of Iran’s continual enrichment of uranium had cost the country more than £118bilion ($160billion) in oil revenue from 2012-2016.

So under the deal, $100billion of assets which were frozen overseas were made available and Iran could sell oil legally on international markets once more. 

What went wrong?

President Trump abandoned the deal in May 2018 and in November the same year he reinstated sanctions on Iran.

This led to another downturn in Iran’s economy, sending the value of its currency plummeting. 

Its annual inflation quadrupled, foreign investors were deterred, and domestic protests became more forceful and frequent. 

Finally, in May of this year, Iran suspended its commitments under the agreement, despite the attempts by the UK, Germany and France to keep it alive.  

What has happened since? 

 UN sanctions have not yet been re-imposed but the IAEA said Iran has already increased its production of enriched uranium, although it is unclear by how much. 

If it is confirmed that Iran has violated any aspect of the deal, the sanctions are set to return for the next ten years. 

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *